Wyatt Technical Services LLC
Editor’s Note: Click on the pdf icon at left for a printable copy of this article.
Because time-to-market and budget factors often drive many of today’s high-tech designs, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) issues often surface at the last moment in the design cycle, potentially delaying product introductions. Very often, simple troubleshooting techniques can identify issues early when the cost of implementation is substantially lower and design improvements may be made with less impact on schedules. This article describes a number of simple probing tools and techniques useful in reducing the radiated emissions (RE) of a product that will better prepare it for a successful radiated emission compliance test.
There are usually five key threats that comprise most electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) problems: radiated emissions, electrostatic discharge (ESD), susceptibility to RF fields, power disturbances and internal crosstalk. Of these, radiated emissions (RE) can be the most difficult test for a product to pass. Because emissions limits are established worldwide, products that don’t meet the limits may not be placed on the market. The best way to achieve compliance is through proper product design, but often these design techniques are not taught in universities, nor are these techniques fully understood by many experienced engineers. The result is that EMC is considered “black magic” and many products must be tested repeatedly through a system of trial and error, in order to finally achieve compliance.
This is unfortunate, because the emissions a product may produce is easily understood if the designer considers that high-frequency currents in circuit loops tend to broadcast these emissions. These circuit loops may be in the form of printed circuit traces (differential-mode currents) or cables connecting two subsystems (common-mode currents). There may also be combinations of these phenomenon, as well as poor printed circuit board layout practices. The circuit and system design of a product usually falls within the domain of the electronic engineer. The other consideration is the shielding properties of the product, which typically falls within the domain of the mechanical engineer. Ideally, these two must work together as a team to address the whole product in order to be successful in addressing EMC.
In troubleshooting any radiated emission problem, it’s useful to think of the problem in the form of a “source-path-receptor” model. See Figure 1.
Typically, the source of radiated emissions is a high-frequency crystal oscillator or other high-frequency, fast-edged, high-current signal. ASICs, FPGAs and A/D or D/A converters may also generate these high-frequency harmonics. Sources of common-mode currents include simultaneous switching noise (SSN) through common impedances, routing of clock traces over gaps in return planes and unbalanced physical structures or resonances in PC boards or enclosures.
The “path” is the coupling mechanism, or the means, by which the high-frequency energy is coupled to the radiating element (enclosure slot, cable, etc.). This may include conducted, radiated, inductive or capacitive couplings.
The “receptor”, in most cases, is the EMI receiver at the test site with specified emission limits, but in the real world could include interference to radio, television, or communication systems.
By using simple measurement probes, it should be possible to identify the source or sources. Once the sources are identified, the path or coupling mechanism must be identified and fixed. What’s difficult is that there may be multiple sources and coupling mechanisms to identify and fix, before passing results are achieved. In addition, if a fix is improperly installed, the emission can actually get worse! That’s probably why the field of EMC is considered so mysterious.
By using a structured approach, the troubleshooting phase should go smoothly. Generally, you’ll want to diagnose the issues first – then try various fixes. Leave these fixes installed as you continue the troubleshooting process. By setting up a simple antenna and EMI receiver or spectrum analyzer a fixed distance away (1 to 3m) from where you’re troubleshooting you can monitor your results real-time. Note, however, a 10 dB drop in emissions at 1m does not necessarily indicate the same drop in the measurement chamber, due to near-field effects.
Identify the Sources
The first step should always be to identify the likely sources. If you’re failing at 300 or 500 MHz, for example, are these the third or fifth harmonics of a 100 MHz clock oscillator? How about the memory clocking? Generally memory address and data busses are fairly random. The exception would be the A0 or D0 line, which is clocking at a relatively non-random rate. What about clock lines to ASICs or FPGAs? If you have multiple crystal oscillators, which could be the cause of a particular harmonic, applying freeze spray on one, then the other, can often identify the offending oscillator.
The frequency is key to any radiated emission problem. As a quick rule of thumb, the higher the frequency, the more likely the coupling path is radiated. The lower the frequency, the more likely the path is conducted. In fact, the common break frequency during compliance testing is 30 MHz. Below that, we measure conducted emissions (CE) – above that we measure RE. If your product uses a high-frequency crystal oscillator with fast edge speeds, the harmonic content can be estimated with the formula in Equation 1.
Equation 1. Maximal RE frequency estimate, where f = EMI frequency (Hz) and tr = risetime (seconds).
For example, with 1 nsec logic, the harmonic content may be centered around 300 MHz. Another rule of thumb is that for frequencies below about 300 MHz, the problem is most likely due to common-mode emissions from cables and above that; the problem is most likely radiation from slots or seams in the metal chassis or circuit board radiation.
The dimensions of physical structures are also an important factor in troubleshooting an emissions problem. Recall that the wavelength (m) of a resonant wire at frequency, f, in free space is:
Equation 2. Wavelength of a wire in free space, where c = speed of light in m/s and f = frequency in Hz.
The dimensions of physical structures, like circuit boards, must be reduced by the velocity factor of the board material (example, 4.7 for FR4 circuit boards). However, typical cables, such as USB or video, are approximately 1m long and can be considered as being in free space. Wires or slots may resonate strongly at multiples of a quarter wavelength. For example, a 1m long cable has a full-wave resonance of 300 MHz, but may also radiate strongly at 150 and 75 MHz. Slots or seams of 8 to 15 cm may resonate in the area of 500 to 800 MHz. As a general rule of thumb, radiating cables or chassis slots of 1/ 20th wavelength or greater, start to become significant radiating elements (or antennas) for RE.
The antenna you select should ideally be somewhere near resonance for the frequencies of concern, however, it’s not really that critical for troubleshooting purposes. So long as the antenna is fixed in length and fixed in place on the bench, you’ll receive consistent results. During troubleshooting, it’s more important to know whether the fix is “better” or “worse” or “no change” and as long as the test setup doesn’t change, the results should be believable.
Now, EMC antennas are not inexpensive, as you might imagine, so for general troubleshooting, I tend to use a couple inexpensive television antennas – a pair of “rabbit ears” and a UHF “bowtie” (with TV balun to match 50-ohm coax). See Figure 2.
If the workbench is wooden, I’ll extend the antenna to approximate resonance (if possible) and tape it down to the bench with duct tape. If the bench is metallic, I’ll find a non-conductive support and position it some distance away from the bench. I usually use a test distance of about a meter, but as long as you can see the product’s harmonics on a spectrum analyzer, you’ll be able to determine your progress. Sometimes I need to insert a low-noise wide-band preamp between antenna and analyzer.
Now, obviously, ambient signals from broadcast radio, television mobile phones and two-way radio services will tend to interfere with observing the product harmonics. You may need to bring the antenna closer or set up the troubleshooting measurement in a basement or building interior away from outside windows. I usually record the known harmonics of concern using an H-field probe or by bringing the measurement antenna in close and then try to characterize them in relation to other nearby ambient signals.
There are a variety of useful probes that may be used to troubleshoot RE problems; E-field, H-field and current probes.1 All are easily made in the lab or are available from several manufacturers. An E-field probe may be made by extending the center conductor about 0.5 cm from a section of semi-rigid coax or high-quality flexible coax; then attaching a coax connector to the other end. Shorting of the probe to circuit traces may be avoided by wrapping insulating tape around the end. A useful H-field probe may be fashioned by looping the center conductor around and soldering it to the shield to form a small loop of 0.5 to 5 cm in diameter – the larger the loop, the more sensitivity. A better H-field probe design uses semi-rigid coax to form the loop (see examples in Figures 3 and 4). Occasionally, I’ll need to amplify the harmonic signals and so use a DIY broadband preamplifier as shown in Figure 5. Beehive Electronics also makes a low-cost amplifier.
Locating Internal Sources
Connect your probe to the input of an EMI receiver or spectrum analyzer to display the harmonics as the probe is brought into close contact with the circuit traces or chassis slots. Depending on the diameter of your H-field probe, you may need to use a broadband preamplifier between the probe and analyzer.2
Generally, once you are finished mapping out your sources, you should start with the lower harmonics and work upwards. Often, lower-frequency sources will cause significant high-frequency harmonics, depending upon the rise time. By fixing the low-frequency source, you’ll often resolve the high-frequency harmonics, as well. Next, check cables and then the enclosure.
Check your cables next, as they are often the worst offenders. Moving a “hot” cable will alter the RE levels. I usually unplug all cables; then try plugging each one in individually to find all that are radiating. Remember that there may be more than one bad cable! Snapping a ferrite choke around the base of the cable will probably help as an interim fix. I’ve found that most cable emissions are very likely due to poor grounding to the enclosure at the I/O connector.
Cable common-mode currents may also be measured directly versus frequency with a current probe.3 Use of current probes usually works better than antennas, because they tend to pick up fewer ambient signals due to their e-field shield. Clamp the probe around the cable in question and move it back and forth to maximize the readings – then fix it in place while you apply potential fixes.
You can make your own current probe or purchase commercial versions. The advantage of commercial versions is that they can open up and snap around a cable. Examples of my DIY probe is shown in Figure 7, while commercial versions are shown in Figure 8.
Equation 3. Calculation of Ic given the measured V and Zt (from Figure 11). Next, plug Ic into Equation 4 to calculate the predicted E-field emission level in V/m. Converting this to dBuV/m will indicate a pass or fail due to the cable being measured.
The equation for calculating the emission level in volts/meter for a CM signal is shown below in Equation 4.
Equation 4. Field level (V/m) due to CM current, where f = frequency (Hz), L = length of the wires (m) and d = the measurement distance (typically 3m or 10m).
Slots & Seams
Once the cables and associated I/O connectors are addressed, it’s time to probe for radiation leakage through slots or seams in the chassis. Remember, that the length of the slot or seam is important. Any seam with leakage whose effective length is longer than 1/ 20th of a wavelength at the harmonic of concern has the potential to be an effective radiator. For example, a slot of 2.5 cm can just start radiating harmonics at 1000 MHz. I use a permanent marking pen to record the areas of leakage and frequencies of concern from every seam/slot on the enclosure.
Once these are marked, I’ll carefully cover over all the openings with copper tape and re-measure the RE levels. Keeping an eye on the RE levels, I’ll start removing the tape piece-by-piece to determine which slots or seams are actually causing problems. Often, just a few slots or seams will cause the most problems. Once the leakages are identified, you can determine the appropriate fixes with your mechanical engineer.
For speedy troubleshooting and analysis, I’ve assembled an EMC troubleshooting kit into a portable Pelican case, which can be wheeled right to an engineer’s workbench. Major contents include a small spectrum analyzer (Thurlby Thander PSA2701T, available from Newark Electronics), a broadband preamplifier (Mini-Circuit Labs or Beehive Electronics), small DIY antennas, various probes and other accessories. Other useful items for your troubleshooting kit include ferrite chokes, aluminum foil, copper tape, power line filters, signal filters and various values of resistors and capacitors. Figure 12 shows an overall view of the contents.
In order to pass required EMC tests for radiated emissions, it is necessary to understand the basic concepts of current flow through loops, as well as differential- and common-mode currents and how they’re generated.
Troubleshooting an existing design is simply the process of identifying the likely sources, determining the coupling paths through probing, and applying temporary fixes. Once these fixes have been applied and the product passes, then the electronic and mechanical engineers may determine the most cost-effective solutions. Obviously, troubleshooting or characterizing products early in the design cycle are preferred in order to reduce overall implementation costs.
Kenneth Wyatt, Sr. EMC Engineer, Wyatt Technical Services LLC, holds degrees in biology and electronic engineering and has worked as a senior EMC engineer for Hewlett-Packard and Agilent Technologies for 21 years. He also worked as a product development engineer for 10 years at various aerospace firms on projects ranging from DC-DC power converters to RF and microwave systems for shipboard and space systems. He can be contacted at
1. Probe manufacturers include Fischer Custom Communications, Beehive Electronics or Teseq.
2. I made my own broadband preamp using a MiniCircuits model ZX60-3018G-S, which covers 20 to 3000 MHz at 18-23 dB gain and 2.7 dB noise figure. It sells for USD 50.
3. Commercial current probes are available from Fischer Custom Communications, Teseq or Solar Electronics, as well as many others.
4. The handheld spectrum analyzer being used for the cable test is made by Thurlby Thander Instruments. It sells for approximately USD 1995 and covers 1 MHz to 2.7 GHz.
Francis Bongo says
Thanks for sharing this one.I like the DIY tools you made.